Negative Time Comment

Let’s look at this one here: Evidence of negative time.

First of all, where is the Uranium?

It says Uranium zero times in the article.

Nothing, zero.

What is this bullshit article?

It also has to always talk about Uranium.

You can do much more interesting stuff with Uranium that you cannot imagine.

You only want to experiment with Uranium.

Everything has to be always related to Uranium and nothing else.

This is the most important, you are always trying to build a more advanced nuclear weapon than the one that is currently known.

This is the by nature integrated survival of the fittest nuclear weapon mode.

The human being has this program as a default internal program running.

You always have a competition of the fittest nuclear weapon running, non-fucking stop.

Every experiment you do has to include Uranium as well.

Everything you do has to be done from the Uranium standpoint.

First of all apply everything to Uranium first, this is the most important and this is how nature dictates it.

Because nothing is helping the people more than killing the enemy.

Killing the enemy is helping the people the most.

This is the holy grail activity.

Killing the enemy is the best way to help the human being, nothing else beats it.

This is the definition of helping people, killing the enemy.

The article doesn’t mention Uranium once

This is already a bad sign, this is pretty much a shit article, this is not science.

If there is no Uranium involved, it is not science.

But let’s just assume they forgot about the Uranium this time and give it a chance.

Let’s take a look.

The punchline at the top says:

“Physicists showed that photons can seem to exit a material before entering it, revealing observational evidence of negative time” — source

Then try that shit on Uranium.

Every time you figure out some new mechanism or process, you have to immediately try it with Uranium first.

Of course, you have to do this, this is standard nature science protocol, or do you want to let the inner beings inside and then have like 8 billion people working on nuclear weapons at the same time?

This is standard nature protocol, inventing new nuclear weapons, try everything on Uranium first.

The main science goal is always to build a more advanced nuclear weapon

You need to already have the most hardcore high-tech nuclear weapon you can possibly imagine before you ever let the inner beings of the people inside this world, or they will come up with better models right away.

If you don’t already have super advanced models, they will come up with better models immediately.

That’s why you need to have the most advanced nuclear weapon models already before you ever let even a single inner being inside this world, got it?

Your nuclear weapon should always be zero heat weapons, no bomb, no explosion, no heat, this is the base requirement, this is a bit more of an advanced nuclear weapon.

If you don’t have a model like this already, then every inner being will find it by themselves directly.

Your nuclear weapons have to be extremely sophisticated, highly advanced, they cannot just be some simple Albert Einstein designs, this is not possible, because the inner beings of the people will figure out something smarter directly.

If your nuclear weapon model is quite simple, it means it is fucking bad.

It has to be highly advanced and sophisticated, nearly uncopyable or close to impossible to figure out, it has to be that advanced, or you are using the wrong nuclear weapon systems.

Now let’s look at the rest of the article.

This is some romantic gay quantum story, what the hell is going on there?

Are there people getting off by reading this or what?

Is this supposed to be some gay sex story or what?

The article has to talk about weapon systems.

It all has to talk about military application.

What the hell is this article talking about?

This sounds like some gay fantasy sex dream.

It has to talk about military applications and nuclear weapon systems, or it is not according to the way nature wants the human to do science.

That’s the comment.